
Monday, April 20, 2009
Business Benefits From Going Green

Sunday, April 19, 2009
Do You Know Who Grows What You Eat?

It looks like buying local is a growing trend in the US. An article today on CNN reports that consumers are increasingly looking for that neighborhood connection in their food. Local farmers' markets are being seen as viable and sensible options for obtaining the freshest produce and dairy. Establishing relationships with the people growing and farming their food gives consumers more comfort than the more distant relationship in a supermarket.
- Accountability
- Safety
- Freshness
- Healthier
- Supportive of sustainable farming vs. industrial farming
- Sensible
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Green, Green Whadda Ya Mean?

Friday, April 17, 2009
Cups of Hope

Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Get Ready For GreenFestival!

| Green Festival™, is a joint project of Global Exchange and Green America (formerly Co-op America), that celebrates what’s working in your communities—for people, business and the environment. The event will focus on finding solutions to help make our lives healthier—socially, economically and environmentally. Individuals will join with business and community leaders and come together to discuss critical issues that impact us at home and abroad. Organizations and businesses will showcase programs and products that restore the planet and all that inhabit it. Neighbor-to-neighbor connections will be formed, and skills will be shared to empower people to create positive change in the world. Enjoy more than 125 renowned authors, leaders and educators; great how-to workshops; cutting-edge films; fun activities for kids; organic beer and wine; delicious vegetarian cuisine and diverse live music. Shop in our unique marketplace of more than 350 eco-friendly businesses—everything from all-natural body care products and organic cotton clothing to Fair Trade gifts and beautiful kitchen tiles made from renewable resources. GreenFestival will take place in the following cities:
Here is a link to a review of the Seattle event that took place at the end of March: Review |
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Something To B Lieve In

A little over a year ago I came across an organization whose mission was to certify companies that operate under a more stringent set of standards of responsibility. My first thought was that such an endeavor was quite noble and also very much needed. My second thought was more along the lines of let's wait and see if they can pull it off. It turns out that they have!
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Ecological Intelligence

A new book by Daniel Goleman that reflects upon the impacts our purchases can have on the environment will soon be available. Old hat you say?! Think again! Goleman is most known for his most famous publication called "Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ." The premise being that self-awareness, self-discipline & empathy are essential ingredients to success and happiness. Add to that that, unlike IQ, emotional intelligence is something anyone can improve upon.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Looks Green, Smells Green, But...

It looks like truth in advertising and green claims will become a ubiquitous part of our ever more complicated consumer panorama. Who is telling the "truth" when it comes to ingredients, practices and so on and so forth?!?
Of 'Greenwash' and Image Management
To be sure, corporate greenwash is an increasingly contentious topic around the globe — and it has moved far beyond the regulation of patently false claims.
Late last month, for example, the Committee of Advertising Practice in Britain, the industry's self-regulating body, proposed stiff new rules for environmental advertising on television, including a requirement that eco-friendly claims should attach to the entire life cycle of a product — from raw material harvesting to factory and on to landfill.
In Australia, a similar industry body — the Australian Association of National Advertisers — issued new codes of its own last week.
Of particular interest in the rule-tightening was the use of vague and ultimately meaningless vernal imagery to imply "greenness."
Meanwhile, in the United States, the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus said it was seeing a marked increase in arbitration cases dealing with green claims of one kind or another.
"It's not merely a case of companies trying to 'greenwash' — although that certainly exists," David Mallen, associate director for N.A.D., said in an e-mail message last week. "There is also genuine confusion in the marketplace about how consumers understand these claims and the appropriate means for substantiating them. Here, industry self-regulation plays a vital role."
Of course, environmental advocates have long argued that self-regulation is an oxymoron. And while government agencies like the Federal Trade Commission in the United States can and do step in on some patently false environmental claims, they are increasingly faced with a murky sort of "truthiness," to borrow a term, in green marketing.
What to do, after all, when a company exploits a minor but true green data point to the exclusion of its larger environmental record, or peddles meaningless green images and aphorisms?
Link to the article at: www.nytimes.com
What Color is Your Money?

It seems that these dire economic times are stirring up some fears of the future in some of our banking institutions. A green bank movement is beginning to emerge that will have its foundation resting solidly on the concept of a "triple bottom line" approach to finance: enterprise, environment and social equity. Wow, imagine how great things could be if capitalism began to calculate costs using a long-term approach! Here are some excerpts from a NY Times article discussing a recent approach to green banking:
E3bank joins a small but growing number of green banking centers sprouting as credit markets normalize. Just as the government is stepping in with the fiscal stimulus package with provisions designed to encourage consumers and businesses to go green, the banking industry is launching green incentives of its own.
The model that e3bank is pursuing envisions having loan officers accredited by the U.S. Green Building Council, or USGBC, as experts in its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) ratings program. Loan officers would be empowered to customize loans and lines of credit to commercial and residential borrowers planning green building projects and retrofits.
Instead of following the industry standard -- basing loans on a borrower's ability to pay and the up-front costs of the building -- e3bank officers will be authorized to modify debt-to-income and loan-to-value proposals. Financial products would be tailored to account for the up-front costs of more expensive green projects but also factor in cost savings from lower energy consumption that would be netted over the course of the loan.
Baldassarre said the bank would also be more flexible in extending loans for solar installations, geothermal heating and other technologies on existing buildings, knowing that the cost savings the extra energy would bring in affects the borrowers' ability to repay the loan. Loan officers at e3bank could also advise customers on the latest green building innovations and the various options that people with projects in mind could consider.
A long time participant in socially and environmentally responsible banking, South Shore Bank, also has its own envelope pushing intitiatives:
Let's hope (and participate in) these types of ventures meet with enough success to force the financial dinosaurs into becoming active and willing participants in building and caring for today and tomorrow.
Check out the entire article at: http://www.nytimes.com/gwire
Here are some additional links to information about green banking initiatives:
Monday, April 6, 2009
Conscious Consumers Craving Accountability

Interest in Green Holds Despite Recession, But Consumers Lack Confidence in Green Claims
(CSRwire) NEW YORK - March 24, 2009 - Nearly one in four U.S. consumers (23%) say they have "no way of knowing" if a product is green or actually does what it claims, signaling a lack of confidence in green marketing and revealing a widespread "green trust gap," according to the BBMG Conscious Consumer Report: Redefining Value in a New Economy, the second national study on purchasing behavior and social values by branding and marketing agency BBMG.
Consumers' lack of trust does not mean lack of interest. The BBMG report finds that 77 percent of Americans agree that they "can make a positive difference by purchasing products from socially or environmentally responsible companies," and they are actively seeking information to verify green claims. Consumers are most likely to turn to consumer reports (29%), certification seals or labels on products (28%) and the list of ingredients on products (27%) to determine if a product is green and does what it claims. Consumers are least likely to look to statements on product packaging (11%) and company advertising (5%), signaling deep skepticism of company-driven marketing.
"The economic crisis has created a moment of reflection where consumers are redefining what truly matters and evaluating purchases based on both value and values," said Raphael Bemporad, co-founder of BBMG, an agency working at the intersection of branding, sustainability and innovation. "This is a moment for leadership. By delivering on the multiple dimensions of value - price, performance and purpose - brands will be able to close the green trust gap, weather the economic storm and thrive in the sustainable economy of the future."
Findings from the BBMG Conscious Consumer Report (2009):
- Interest in Green Holds Despite Tough Economy. Nearly seven in ten Americans agree (67%) that "even in tough economic times, it is important to purchase products with social and environmental benefits," and half (51%) say they are "willing to pay more" for them.
- Price and Performance Still Paramount, But Green Gains Ground. Price (66% very important) and quality (64%) top consumers' list of most important product attributes, followed by good for your health (55%) and made in the USA (49%). But green benefits have increased in importance since last year - including energy efficiency (47% very important in 2008, 41% in 2007), locally grown or made nearby (32% in 2008, 26% in 2007), all natural (31% in 2008, 24% in 2007), made from recycled materials (29% in 2008, 22% in 2007) and USDA organic (22% in 2008, 17% in 2007).
- Wal-Mart Tops List of Most and Least Socially Responsible Companies. When asked unaided which companies come to mind as the most socially or environmentally responsible companies, 7 percent of Americans named Wal-Mart, followed by Johnson & Johnson (6%), Procter & Gamble (4%), GE (4%) and Whole Foods (3%). Wal-Mart also topped the list of the least responsible companies (9%), along with Exxon Mobile (9%), GM (3%) and Ford (3%), Shell (2%) and McDonald's (2%). Interestingly, 41% of Americans could not name a single company that they consider the most socially and environmentally responsible.
- Consumers Reward, Punish and Influence Based on Corporate Practices.Seven in ten consumers (71%) agree that they "avoid purchasing from companies whose practices they disagree with"; and approximately half tell others to shop (55%) or drop (48%) products based on a company's social and environmental practices.
The BBMG Conscious Consumer Report explores the attitudes, preferences, values and experiences that shape consumer purchasing behavior, brand loyalty and peer-to-peer influence. Conducted by BBMG, in conjunction with research partners Global Strategy Group and Bagatto, the report combines ethnographic research in two U.S. markets (conducted in January and February 2009) with a national survey of 2,000 adults (conducted October 26 - November 6, 2008). The survey margin of error is +/- 2.2 percentage points.
About BBMG: With offices in New York City and San Francisco, BBMG is a nationally-recognized firm dedicated to creating innovative brands that reach, engage and inspire today's increasingly conscious consumers. Clients include ShoreBank, Clif Bar, ONE Drinks, Ceres, Green America, Social Venture Network, among others.
For more information please contact:
Andrea Retzky
BBMG
917-587-5473
www.bbmg.com
Phosphate Phree!

I ran across an interesting article on a great blog called triplepundit.com that talks about phosphate legislation and misinformation in the state of Washington. Here it is in it's entirety:
In an effort to reduce water pollution, the state of Washington initiated a ban on dishwasher detergents containing phosphates. Spokane County was the first to implement the ban last year.
Now while Washington isn't the only state to implement such a ban (Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Michigan, Vermont, Minnesota, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York have either banned or are in the process of banning dishwasher detergents containing phosphates), Spokane, for some suspect reason, has drawn the attention of critics who are claiming that residents are actually driving out of the state to get dishwasher detergents that do contain phosphates.
Really?!!!
What we're now hearing is that some Spokane residents are driving about 10 miles or so to buy their phosphate-friendly detergents in Idaho. And why would they spend the extra time and gas money to get those detergents? According to reports, the non-phosphate varieties don't work as well. Here's an excerpt from a recent AP story...
“Many people were shocked to find that products like Seventh Generation, Ecover, and Trader Joe's left their dishes encrusted with food, smeared with grease and too gross to use without rewashing them by hand. The culprit was hard water, which is mineral-rich and resistant to soap.”
My friends, I live in Maryland, and we have extremely hard water. I've also used both Seventh Generation and Ecover, and have NEVER had a problem. Don't get me wrong, if you let your dirty dishes sit for a few days, then just throw them in the dishwasher, you might not get the best results. But the eco-friendly varieties have never let me down. And I'm suspicious of anyone who claims otherwise.
Nonetheless, I don't plan to lose much sleep over those in Spokane who can't live without their phosphates. After all, we expect the business community to do their part to clean up their acts. So shouldn't we expect the same of ourselves?
It's easy to blame “big business” for all of our environmental problems. But all too often we find excuses to shirk our own personal responsibilities. The business community has provided us with non-phosphate dishwasher detergents. So it's on us, the consumers, to do the right thing. And switching over to eco-friendly dishwasher detergents is the right thing.
It's not rocket science, folks. When large amounts of phosphates are discharged into waterways, they can cause excessive algae growth, which robs the water of oxygen fish need to survive. So doesn't it make sense to make a very simple change that can help us limit the phosphates being discharged into our waterways?
Of course, that doesn't mean we necessarily need a full-scale ban on dishwasher detergents containing phosphates. After all, most of us support a free market system that doesn't have to rely on government intervention. And I'm all for it. So instead of a ban, how about this: If some folks want to continue using the phosphate-friendly detergents – let them. Just make sure you tack on the environmental damage cost to the price of that detergent. Do that, and you'll see just how fast those eco-friendly detergents really do work!
Link to the story here:
So, what do well-intentioned consumers do when legislation is passed and then unfounded "gossip" causes less well-intentioned consumers to ignore these regulations in favor of using products that have proven to be harmful to our environment? Ask our little froggy what he thinks!
Sunday, April 5, 2009
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay to host Environmental Symposium
A symposium on green innovations is scheduled for Earth Day to kick off University of Wisconsin-Green Bay's new Environmental Management and Business Institute.
The institute was announced in August with the goal of studying environmental issues and developing solutions to problems that recognize the critical interconnections between science, policy and business, and the social contexts within which they occur.
Interim Chancellor David Ward said the institute will help make Northeastern Wisconsin synonymous with sustainability and environmental leadership.
The university was founded 40 years ago with a focus on environmental education.
The Green Innovationsevent on April 22 will include speakers, breakout sessions and an entrepreneur's showcase. Topics will include biomass conversion, renewable energy sources, green business practices and developing human capital for sustainability.
Speakers will include:
John Stoll, institute co-director and UW-Green Bay faculty member, said the symposium is about informing people that the university is still innovative and environmentally focused.
"It is not just in the past. At no time in history has it been more important that it be in our future," Stoll said.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Sustainability and Branding: The Imperative of Continuity

This white paper, recently released by ADC Partners, identifies a number of the underlying reasons for initiating or maintaining sustainability programs, and for aligning a brand.
It has been suggested that the rapid and pronounced downtown in the economy will make it difficult for companies to continue aligning their brand with sustainability. A review of recent studies and surveys suggest that, in fact, the opposite is true, writes ADC Partners.
Companies that aggressively pursue sustainability may put themselves in a position of unique strategic advantage, the firm says. Ultimately, this can lead to more efficient business practices, an enhanced brand and improved fiscal performance.
ADC Partners has made a copy of its report available to GreenBiz.com for download (PDF).
Clearly folks are adjusting their decision-making to accommodate lower incomes and an unpredictable future. Do you believe that this major global economic downturn has had or will have an impact on current and future development of green initiatives? Are there certain areas that you feel will be more impacted? Less impacted? How has your decision-making changed?
Friday, April 3, 2009
Food For Thought

I listened to this piece on NPR when it first aired on March 26th. I also remember wondering how we get ourselves into situations where the true meaning of a word no longer carries the same intent. In this case, with trans-fat content, zero does not mean none. As consumers, do we want words to be misused or contorted to adapt to the needs and bottom line of corporations or governments?
As Eco-Seals Proliferate, So Do Doubts
As green marketing has proliferated, so has the number of "eco-labels" competing to be the environmental equivalent of a Good Housekeeping seal of approval. According to the Web site ecolabelling.org, there are more than 300 such labels putting a green stamp on everything from cosmetics and seafood to bird-friendly coffee.
THE FAIR TAILOR - STARTING A LOHAS COMPANY

An interesting venture into consciously developing a company based on Lohas values! Check in from time to time to see how they are proceeding!
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Sierra Club Green Home
Friday, July 25, 2008
Citywide Green Business ProgramThe Six Sins of Greenwashing

- The Hidden Trade-off
- No Proof
- Vagueness
- Irrelevance
- Fibbing
- The Lesser of Two Evils
Monday, July 14, 2008
We can ALL be part of the move towards Sustainability!

For some ideas on how to make your company or the company you work for more green, take a trip to GreenBiz.com and read through Logistics and Transportation: Key Steps to a Greener Supply Chain. This article looks at ways to make your processes less consumptive by reviewing your company's logistics in shipping and maximizing use of space, consolidating your shipments, obtaining green certifications, and using alternative fuels.
